![]() M., Grant, C., Gay, G., Gillette, M., Valli, L., & Maria Villegas, M. ![]() Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351–366. Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?”: And other conversations About race. Talking about race, learning about racism: The application of racial identity development theory in the classroom. Getting real about race in school: Everyday antiracism. Beginning courageous conversations about race. Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175–190. A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. ![]() Is everyone really equal?: An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. New study: Over six million students now enrolled in distance education. More than just talk: The use of racial dialogue to combat racism. When topics are controversial: Is it better to discuss them face-to-face or online? Innovations in Higher Education, 31, 175–186. White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Knowledge construction in online learning communities: A case study of a doctoral course. Not light, but fire: How to lead meaningful race conversations in the classroom. We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers, multiracial schools (3rd ed.). The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 35–60. Analyzing social construction of knowledge online by employing interaction analysis, learning analytics, and social network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469–483. Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 65–78. A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Unconscious bias: When good intentions aren’t enough. Response: ‘Courageous conversations’ are needed to discuss race in schools. White fragility: Why it’s so hard for White people to talk about racism. Engaging White college students in productive conversations about race and racism: Avoiding dominant-culture projection and condescension-judgment default. Taylor (personal correspondence, October 2016).ĭeKoven, A. Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Multicultural Perspectives, 7(3), 28–35.Ĭochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. Teachers initiating conversations about race and racism in a high school class. These dimensions include: ideology, institutional, social, cultural, historical, political, and interpersonal” (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2012).īolgatz, J. “The academic term used to capture the all-encompassing dimensions of white privilege, dominance, and assumed superiority in society. Racism encompasses economic, political, social, and institutional actions and beliefs that perpetuate an unequal distribution of privileges, resources, and power between whites and people of Color” (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2012). “In the United States and Canada, racism refers to white racial and cultural prejudice and discrimination, supported by institutional power and authority, used to the advantage of whites and the disadvantage of people of Color. Courageous Conversations:Ĭourageous conversations are conversations that encourage and sustain interracial dialogue about race and have the potential to lead to action and progress. Asynchronous discussions are online discussions that participants can participate in at any time as opposed to synchronous discussions which take place in real time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |